Data Trends: The Statistical Shift

Power must answer crime, not escape it

India has witnessed significant shifts in its crime patterns over the past decade, raising critical questions about law enforcement effectiveness, judicial processes, and governance priorities. This article examines crime rate trends from 2015 to 2025, government responses, high-profile cases, and concerns about constitutional rights and policy focus. According to the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB), in 2023, a total of 62,41,569 crimes were registered nationwide, comprising 37,63,102 Indian Penal Code (IPC) crimes and 24,78,467 Special and Local Laws (SLL) crimes. The crime rate reached 448.3 per 100,000 population in 2023, the highest in the previous three years. The data reveals a complex picture. While the overall crime rate in India dropped by 0.56% from the previous year according to the 2024 NCRB report, certain categories of crime have shown alarming increases, particularly in the digital sphere and crimes against women. India’s crime landscape between 2015 and 2025 reflects deep structural changes driven by digital expansion, socio-economic pressures, and evolving law-enforcement mechanisms. While traditional crimes show mixed trends, cybercrime and crimes against women have emerged as the most alarming areas, revealing both increased victimisation and systemic weaknesses in prevention and justice delivery. The digital transformation of India has been accompanied by an unprecedented surge in cybercrime. Reported cybercrime cases rose from just 9,622 in 2014 to over 77,000 by August 2024. Cybersecurity incidents increased dramatically from 10.29 lakh in 2022 to 22.68 lakh in 2024. A reply by the Ministry of Home Affairs in the Rajya Sabha disclosed that more than 65 lakh cybercrime complaints were registered on the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal between 2021 and June 2025, reflecting a nearly 500% increase in reported cases within three years. The financial impact of cybercrime has been devastating. In 2024 alone, Indians lost more than ₹22,845 crore to cyber frauds, a 206% increase compared to 2023, with over 36 lakh complaints recorded. Financial fraud constitutes nearly 75% of cybercrime cases, followed by phishing, ransomware attacks, identity theft, and emerging threats such as digital arrest scams, deepfake frauds, and Cybercrime-as-a-Service models. Despite

Protected lives at the top, unprotected lives below

institutional mechanisms, conviction rates remain extremely low, highlighting a serious gap between reporting and effective prosecution. Crimes against women continue to rise both in absolute numbers and crime rates. NCRB data shows an increase from 3.37 lakh cases in 2014 to 4.45 lakh cases by 2022, representing over a 30% rise. The crime rate per lakh women increased from 56.3 in 2014 to 66.4 in 2022. Between 2018 and 2022 alone, crimes against women rose by nearly 13%, with an average of 51 complaints filed every hour in 2022.

The most common offences include domestic violence and cruelty by husband or relatives (31–32%), assault with intent to outrage modesty (around 27%), kidnapping and abduction (17–23%), rape and sexual assault (approximately 10%), dowry-related crimes, and workplace sexual harassment. States such as Delhi, Haryana, Telangana, Rajasthan, and Odisha report the highest crime rates. While improved reporting mechanisms may partly explain the rise, experts agree that actual incidents remain significantly underreported. Certain violent crime indicators have remained relatively stable. The murder rate stood at approximately 2.0 per 100,000 population in 2023, while kidnapping was reported at 8.2 per 100,000 and rape at 4.4 per 100,000. These figures, however, mask regional disparities and delays in investigation and trial outcomes.

In July 2024, the Indian government enacted a comprehensive overhaul of the criminal justice system by replacing colonial-era laws with three new statutes: the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA). These laws introduced technology-driven investigations, mandatory forensic examination for serious offences, digital admissibility of evidence, online FIRs, and a more victim-centric approach. The reforms also emphasise time-bound justice, particularly in rape cases, expanded provisions for organised crime and terrorism, and alternatives such as community service for minor offences. However, practical implementation remains uneven across states. The government established institutions such as the Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre (I4C), the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal, and the 1930 cyber helpline. Training initiatives like the CyTrain portal have enrolled over one lakh police officers. Authorities have blocked over 9.4 lakh SIM cards and more than 2.6 lakh IMEIs linked to cyber fraud. The Union Budget 2025-26 allocated ₹782 crore for cybersecurity initiatives, yet cybercrime conviction rates remain below 3%, raising concerns about investigative capacity and judicial follow-through. ost-Nirbhaya reforms include amendments criminalising stalking and sexual harassment, stricter penalties for sexual offences, One Stop Centres for survivors, women’s helplines, fast-track courts, and the Nirbhaya Fund. Despite these initiatives, conviction rates in sexual violence cases remain as low as 5–10%, reflecting systemic inefficiencies and social barriers. While awareness, reporting, and technological integration have improved, critical challenges persist. FIR delays, underutilization of cybercrime funds, poor forensic capacity, and massive judicial backlogs undermine the justice system. Regional disparities further weaken uniform enforcement. The Bhima Koregaon case exemplifies concerns over the use of stringent laws like the UAPA. Sixteen activists, academics, lawyers, and journalists were arrested, many spending over six years in prison without trial. The death of Father Stan Swamy in custody and forensic findings suggesting planted digital evidence intensified scrutiny. Despite extremely low conviction rates under UAPA, prolonged detention and denial of bail remain common. Similar patterns have emerged in the Delhi riots case, Kashmir-related arrests, and cases involving journalists and rights defenders, raising fears of criminalising dissent. These developments raise fundamental questions regarding Articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution. Critics argue that preventive detention, prolonged incarceration without trial, and selective enforcement create a chilling effect on free speech and equality before the law. Courts have expressed concern but often hesitate to intervene in matters labelled as national security. India faces genuine security threats, but experts caution that security cannot override constitutional safeguards indefinitely. A democracy requires space for criticism, lawful protest, and protection of minority and dissenting voices. Excessive reliance on special laws risks eroding public trust in institutions.

Conclusion

The period from 2015 to 2025 reveals a complex and troubling crime narrative. Cybercrime has exploded, crimes against women remain deeply entrenched, and conviction rates lag far behind arrests. While legislative reforms and institutional mechanisms mark progress, implementation failures and civil liberties concerns persist. The real test of India’s democracy lies in its ability to deliver timely justice, protect fundamental rights, ensure accountability, and align governance priorities with constitutional values of justice, liberty, equality, and fraternity.

SORCES @